#2 PaulEchere 6 December 2023, 6:57 a.m. Private Member Guess there might be some truth in that kind of analysis, however, you likely can never know for sure, perhaps sometimes it might be a complete false positive. Imo, in most cases, random content writers picked up at places like Fiverr will always use AI tools to create at least (best case scenario) the carcass of your future post, or the entire post. In my experience, whenever I create content for someone else (and I think that’s a good practice in general), we agree on what degree of AI usage is acceptable. We also agree on the exact topics and discuss a potential draft candidate (when it’s ready) before submitting the final version. That’s how I see good paid content creation is done, though that would usually cost a bit more, of course. “ Reply With Quote #3 chaumi 6 December 2023, 10:09 a.m. Private Member If I use the best AI generation tool, I know to create an article, it will take: • Approx 30 mins to 1 hour to prepare the outline (dependent on topic) • Approx 15 mins to line it up and generate • At least 4 hours subsequent work - amending, adapting, improving. Maybe more. It will cost less than a dollar in creation cost. But obviously a lot more in time. But it’ll be good, and I’ll be happy with it. So, if your supplier is doing anything like that, then it sounds hugely reasonable. But I expect they’re not doing that. With the best tool I know, if they are just giving it a subject and hitting enter, and sending it to you without further editing, it will likely cost them less than a dollar. But still a bit of time setting it up, making sure it’s completed, looks reasonably OK with no totally obvious hallucinations or inaccuracies, getting it into a doc and sending it. Maybe 15-30 minutes. I haven’t used Originality.ai, but it is supposedly one of the better AI testers. I would imagine false positives are entirely possible with it. But personally, I don’t care what a tool says. And 1. I don’t think Google does either, 2. I don’t think users care, provided the information that’s being presented is useful, well-presented, and answers the query. I can pretty much guarantee that any purely AI-generated piece won’t (in the vast majority of cases) be good enough to meet those needs at the level of complexity and understanding necessary for most gambling-related topics. But a carefully engineered, edited, improved, enhanced piece? Yes. Knowing how to engineer, edit, improve, enhance is crucial. The AI won’t do it on its own. If you don’t know how to do that/don’t have the time, then it’s likely that “rubbish/bland/suboptimal” AI content will not be helping your site, or if it is then there’s a chance it won’t be helping at some point in future. Maybe the very near future. I will end by saying...everything I said is based on current status. I have little doubt that within a year, maybe two, there will be (close to) zero need for any human writer or editor. And the AI will be clever enough to out-write 99.9% of human writers with minimal to zero input, editing, and enhancement. But that’s the future. “ Reply With Quote #4 onlinebetdotcom 6 December 2023, 1:31 p.m. Public Member You should also test your content writers after you hire them. I’ve hired someone many months ago and their first two articles were amazing. The next three produced were as bad as if someone translated it three- or four-times using Google translate back into English. I think they copied other website content and used spinning tools. You always have to stay on top of your writers because they will cut corners if you allow them to. “ Reply With Quote 15 GPWAtimes.org
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDIzMTA=